A Revelation of Hope and Hopelessness

I had a dream that at first seemed simple, but it stayed with me because of what I felt in it. I was in my office at work, seated at my computer, going about an ordinary day. And then, without warning, I began saying, “I’m going to see Jesus.” I said it again and again. The words felt true and certain, and I had no hesitation or doubt about them.

I got up from my chair, but instead of walking, I floated. I drifted out of my office cluster and into the main hallway that circles the perimeter of the building. At the far end of the hall, where the corridor turned a corner, I saw a bright light. Instantly I knew: this was Jesus. The certainty of it was as matter-of-fact as recognizing someone I worked with. I kept repeating the same phrase, “I’m going to see Jesus,” while slowly floating toward the light.

I was almost there when something happened that was not my doing. Without any act of will, as though I were on a track, my body turned away from the light and drifted right, down the hallway that continued around the square.

What I saw there was devastation.

The hallway was ruined, furniture thrown everywhere, people screaming. But what struck me far more deeply than anything I saw was what I felt. A hopelessness so heavy and final that it was unlike anything I had ever experienced. And I realized, even in the dream, that I had never once known true hopelessness in my waking life. No matter where I had been, no matter what I believed or didn’t believe at the time, Jesus had always been there. His presence had always been a constant in my life, whether acknowledged or not.

But in that hallway, Jesus was gone. There was no presence of God. No comfort. No light. Just a complete absence, and the hopelessness that comes with it.

And then I woke up.

The dream confused me, because in the dream I wasn’t turning away from Jesus. I was heading straight toward Him. I wanted to go toward the light. The turn was not my choice. So I asked my pastor about it, and after I described the dream he said something simple:

“I think the Lord is giving you a burden for the lost.”

His comment made sense of what I could not. The dream wasn’t about my destiny, or some hidden fear in me, or a warning that I was turning away. In the dream, I was already going toward Jesus. The turn away from Him wasn’t a failure — it was a revelation.

I believe I was shown the hopelessness of hell, not as fire or torture, but as the absence of Christ. A glimpse of what it means to exist without His presence, even for a moment. And the contrast was so sharp because I have never lived a day of my life without Him being there.

If that dream had any purpose, it was to teach me compassion — to understand, even faintly, the inner reality of souls who have no hope because they have not known the One who is hope. I think that’s what my pastor meant by “a burden for the lost.” It was not about fear. It was about understanding.

And that is what has stayed with me.

John’s Adoption Story: A New Perspective at the Cross

There is a common assumption that Joseph must have died before Jesus began His ministry. The usual reason given is the scene at the cross where Jesus gives Mary to John. The thinking goes, Mary needed someone to care for her because Joseph was gone, therefore Jesus asked John to take that place.

I’ve always accepted that because everyone repeats it, but recently I started looking at the scene in John’s Gospel by itself. And once you slow down and read the passage carefully, something interesting comes into focus.

The scene is not shaped around Mary’s need. It is shaped around John’s.

The Gospel says, “From that hour, the disciple took her into his own.” The emphasis is on John receiving Mary, not Mary receiving care. The text highlights what happens to John, not what happens to Mary.

That pushed me to think about John’s situation. John never mentions his parents in his Gospel. His father appears once early in the Synoptics and disappears. His mother is never named in John’s Gospel, not even at the cross. John stands alone at a moment when families normally gather. And Jesus has an unusually close, almost family-level relationship with him.

So here’s the thought that came to me:
“John, here is your mother” makes far more sense if John had already lost his own mother.
Without that, Jesus’ words would almost sound like He’s giving John a second mother while his real mother is alive somewhere offstage. But if John was already motherless, the whole scene becomes clear and very personal.

In that light, Jesus is not replacing a missing Joseph in Mary’s life, but filling a missing relationship in John’s life.

In other words, what if John had lost his parents, and Jesus had taken him under His wing long before the cross? That would make the scene a moment of adoption, not housekeeping. Mary gains a son, and John gains a mother. That fits the tone of John’s Gospel, which is all about new birth and new family, not biological ties. It also matches Jesus saying, “I will not leave you as orphans.”

This way of reading it actually fits the Gospel of John better than the usual explanation. John does not present himself as someone who already has a mother present at the crucifixion. He presents himself as someone who needs a mother, and someone whom Jesus is bringing fully into a new household of faith.

I am not trying to argue against tradition. I just think this gives fresh clarity to the passage. Instead of Jesus solving a practical problem for Mary, He may be doing something deeper: forming the very first spiritual family at the foot of the cross.

Mary gains John.
John gains Mary.
A new household begins right there.

It is an adoption story.

From Doubt to Faith: My Spiritual Journey

For me, when I was younger, questions about God and religion were mostly an intellectual thing. I was taught to believe, but I also saw people around me who claimed to believe acting like they didn’t. That always made me wonder… does God actually exist? And if He does, what’s the right religion?

By my 40s, I had done a deep dive into world religions, trying to make sense of it all. None of it really answered that central question.

Then I met a girl. We started dating, and she said, “I’m a Christian.” I said, “That’s nice for you, but I’m pretty sure God doesn’t exist.”, she didn’t believe me… “Oh you’re an agnostic”

One Friday I asked her out, and she said, “That’s my prayer meeting night, why don’t you come along?” I figured, sure, I want to get to know her, so I’ll go. She warned me, “Just so you know, people will be speaking in tongues and it can get pretty intense.” I told her, “No problem. If it gets weird, I’ll just wait in the car.”

So I went. The pastor opened with a prayer, people stood up and started praising God… and something hit me like a ton of bricks: God is real. It’s hard to explain, but it was like something in me suddenly knew, without logic or debate.

Afterward she said, “It’s okay if you don’t want to come again.” I just said, kind of sheepishly, “Actually… I think I’d like to.”

That night changed my life. I kept going, had a few more experiences like that, and about a month later, at a church picnic, I became a believer.

That girl became my wife. She has dementia now, and is unable to speak except in rare lucid moments. One time I was able to tell her how much I love her, and she was able to say “I know.”

Message to Christian Gatekeepers

I had an exchange in comments with what I will call Christian Gatekeepers. They gate keep the country when they want to turn away immigrants and asylum seekers, and they use Heaven as justification saying Heaven has a strict immigration policy. Sounds cool, but this is also gate keeping.

My response is heaven is open to everyone. Yes, absolutely everyone.

There is only two simple requirements. That you Love God, and Love your neighbor.

But then they say: “No! What about Jesus!”

Well it’s Jesus himself who said this, so I’m going to add here for people who are easily confused:

When Jesus said these things allow you to enter life he knew he was talking to a believer, In the same way it goes without saying you need belief in Jesus to enter life.

Think about it, the commands are to Love. And God is Love, Jesus is God.

If Love is in your heart, that’s Jesus!

If there is no love in your heart, where does that put you with respect to Jesus?

Now here is a part, try to understand…. This love is “Agape” in Greek. That’s totally committed self sacrificing Love”,

And so many christians, that push back on.. “You gotta Love”, don’t understand what Christian Love is. They think of it in emotional terms. It’s not that. Emotional Love, in many ways is self serving, it’s an internal feeling.

Agape Love is Active, Proactive. It’s constructive, supportive and yes.. it’s is transformational. It transforms the loved, and it transforms the lover.

How can I say this? Because God is Love, that’s why.

John 3:16. For God so Loved the world he gave his only Son so that whosoever believes in him shall have eternal Life. That’s Agape in action! Jesus is Love and the Life.

So this is why it’s so important when Jesus said, what you did for the poor and needy you did for Me.

It’s not for us to say “Get a job!” to them, or say “It’s not my problem take care of yourself!” We need to Agape them.

An unpopular opinion about health care for undocumented immigrants.

I’ve been thinking about how both political parties agree that federal funds shouldn’t be used for healthcare for undocumented immigrants. To me, that’s wrong, especially coming from people who call themselves Christians.

Over time, I’ve come to realize how far the “Christian Right” has drifted from what Jesus actually taught. They talk a lot about faith, but very little about love. I’ve changed my view on Paul, I still think he’s important, but I focus on what Jesus said. In the version of Christianity shaped by Paul’s letters, the way to heaven is “faith alone.” Love becomes optional. And when I bring up the lack of love, I’m told, “That was the old covenant.”

But that misses the point entirely. In the new covenant, God writes the law on our hearts, and that law is summed up in two simple commands: Love God and love your neighbor. If someone’s heart lacks that love, then, as James said, their faith is dead.

The Christian Right’s worldview is built on individualism, the idea that everyone should be self-sufficient and that helping others makes them dependent. But that’s not Christianity. That’s selfishness dressed up as holiness. Jesus taught self-giving, not self-protection.

How can they think what Jesus taught is the “old covenant”? Easy, the gospel of Jesus is very different from the interpreted gospel of Paul. If you look closely, Jesus’s gospel already contains it all, the moral law (summed up in love) and the faith (in John 3:16). Paul might have meant the same thing, but even Peter said people misunderstand him. James tried to correct that misunderstanding, but mainstream Christianity became Pauline instead of Christ-like.

Maybe if we actually followed what Jesus said, love God, love your neighbor, we wouldn’t be so eager to deny healthcare, compassion, or dignity to anyone.