There is a common assumption that Joseph must have died before Jesus began His ministry. The usual reason given is the scene at the cross where Jesus gives Mary to John. The thinking goes, Mary needed someone to care for her because Joseph was gone, therefore Jesus asked John to take that place.
I’ve always accepted that because everyone repeats it, but recently I started looking at the scene in John’s Gospel by itself. And once you slow down and read the passage carefully, something interesting comes into focus.
The scene is not shaped around Mary’s need. It is shaped around John’s.
The Gospel says, “From that hour, the disciple took her into his own.” The emphasis is on John receiving Mary, not Mary receiving care. The text highlights what happens to John, not what happens to Mary.
That pushed me to think about John’s situation. John never mentions his parents in his Gospel. His father appears once early in the Synoptics and disappears. His mother is never named in John’s Gospel, not even at the cross. John stands alone at a moment when families normally gather. And Jesus has an unusually close, almost family-level relationship with him.
So here’s the thought that came to me:
“John, here is your mother” makes far more sense if John had already lost his own mother.
Without that, Jesus’ words would almost sound like He’s giving John a second mother while his real mother is alive somewhere offstage. But if John was already motherless, the whole scene becomes clear and very personal.
In that light, Jesus is not replacing a missing Joseph in Mary’s life, but filling a missing relationship in John’s life.
In other words, what if John had lost his parents, and Jesus had taken him under His wing long before the cross? That would make the scene a moment of adoption, not housekeeping. Mary gains a son, and John gains a mother. That fits the tone of John’s Gospel, which is all about new birth and new family, not biological ties. It also matches Jesus saying, “I will not leave you as orphans.”
This way of reading it actually fits the Gospel of John better than the usual explanation. John does not present himself as someone who already has a mother present at the crucifixion. He presents himself as someone who needs a mother, and someone whom Jesus is bringing fully into a new household of faith.
I am not trying to argue against tradition. I just think this gives fresh clarity to the passage. Instead of Jesus solving a practical problem for Mary, He may be doing something deeper: forming the very first spiritual family at the foot of the cross.
Mary gains John.
John gains Mary.
A new household begins right there.
It is an adoption story.
Stefanos's Blog 